Ben Fiedler

'changeme' is valid base64

Base64-encoding is ubiquitous in our modern world. Many programs communicate in base64-encoded messages, since these have nice properties: They consist of a very limited subset of ASCII characters, and can thus be displayed as text. E-Mails for example are commonly encoded in base64 in transfer, which can be seen in the Content-Transfer-Encoding header.

Where I volunteer we have a tradition of putting changeme as a placeholder for many template variables indicating that they should be overwritten later. Thus, if we later still see changeme anywhere we know that somewhere somebody must have forgotten to specify a variable1.

Sometimes these template variables should correspond to base64-encoded content, i.e. the base64-decoding of said variable should produce meaningful content. But what happens if somebody forgets to define said variable, and it is substituted with changeme instead? I always thought that it would fail to decode the string since the probability that changeme is actually valid base64 encoding must be very low. But lo and behold, this is not the case:

% echo changeme | base64 -d

Running hexdump on the output we can identify the characters:

% echo changeme | base64 -d | hexdump -C
00000000  72 16 a7 81 e9 9e      |r.....|

Mostly nonsense, but the second byte is interesting: It is an ASCII control character 2, meaning trips up all sorts of programs which expect to read printable ASCII characters, such as JSON deserializers.

This bug actually occurred when I was migrating some applications between different Kubernetes clusters: In the old cluster the application ran without problems, but I forgot to specify some variable in the new cluster, and it lead to Go complaining about non-ASCII characters in a JSON string.

I guess the moral of the story is: If you use dummy values be sure that they cannot be misinterpreted.

Articles from blogs I follow


Footnote Final Chapter Epilogue Before the darkness was the darkness, the darkness was a child. This child found themselves lost and without purpose. Life was scary. Things were changing constantly, and they found themselves at a loss. One day they were walkin…

via Christine Dodrill's Blog on

Status update, June 2021

Hiya! Got another status update for you. First, let me share this picture that my dad and I took on our recent astronomy trip (click for full res): Bonus Venus: So, what’s new? With SourceHut, there are a few neat goings-on. For one, thanks to Michael Forney …

via Drew DeVault's blog on

What's cooking on Sourcehut? June 2021

Halfway through 2021! Things are on-track for my hopes to have the beta ship this year. Joining us on the way are 23,228 users, of which 640 are new this month. Remember to be patient with them as they learn the ins and outs of using! This month’s Mumbl…

via Blogs on Sourcehut on